The Oddity of Words.

What nonsense has done to our vocabulary and what vocabulary has done to our nonsense.

Image for post
Image for post
Courtesy of (Dr. Seuss)

You have to be odd to be number one.” Dr. Seuss

Theodor Geisel (Dr. Seuss), author of 42 children’s books, didn’t like kids. As Geisel once confessed, “You have’m, I’ll amuse’m.” He created The Cat In the Hat because he found Dick and Jane boring. Oh, The Places You’ll Go was supposed to be read by expectant mothers.

He also coined the word “nerd” for his book If I Ran the Zoo.

“I like nonsense, it wakes up the brain cells,” Geisel once said, and he certainly believed in nonsense. Little did he know he’d be coining a term (nerd) for future tech billionaires. In turn, they would invent their own odd words like “zap” and “pram,” while rendering words like “help” completely useless.

Not only did Geisel create “nerd,” he also created “guff,” which went on to become “I don’t take no guff.” He prided himself on not taking any guff from children. This was accomplished this by not having any. His wife, Audrey, admitted they scared the crap out of him. He didn’t do readings.

Possibly Carroll would have chortled and been snarky if someone had accused him of pedophilia.

Lewis Carroll liked children — possibly too much, according to some Carroll scholars. He took nude pictures of Alice’s older sister, Lorina Liddell (then 13 years old). That could have landed him in prison. Perhaps writing Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland showed he was just looking for a muse. Be that as it may, going from a 13 to an 11-year-old wasn’t exactly moving in the right direction — even for a pedophile.

Photography aside, Carroll still managed to come up with some pretty interesting words like “chortle” and “snark.” Possibly he would have chortled and been a snark if someone had accused him of pedophilia.

Chortle is actually a combination of “chuckle” and “snort,” what linguists call a “portmanteau.” This was invented by Lewis Carroll, too. He probably figured someone was going to take him to task over “slithy” which combines “slim” and “lithe.”

He went on to help form the “cyberpunk” movement when he ran out of hippy chicks.

Fans of Superman might be interested to know that the word itself wasn’t created by Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster. Long before they developed their “caped crusader,” George Bernard Shaw coined the term for Man and Superman. He, in turn, stole it from Friedrich Nietzsche. Both men wore capes over their tuxedos and Nietzsche thought he could fly.

William Gibson is credited with the term “cyberspace” which first appeared in his short story Burning Chrome. Gibson was a conscientious objector during the Vietnam War. Moving to Toronto, he said that he wasn’t avoiding the draft so much as wanting to “sleep with hippie chicks.” He went on to help form the “cyberpunk” movement after he ran out of hippy chicks.

So why are odd people responsible for so many words? Linguists believe it’s all part of the creative process. Once you step outside standard literary form, throwing in a few words of your own seems perfectly acceptable.

Anthony Burgess created a whole vocabulary for A Clockwork Orange. His characters were so weirdly violent, it seemed natural to give them weird names. Like Carroll, Burgess tended to use portmanteaus, such as “droog” which is a variation of the Russian “drug fiend.”

One day, he just blurted out “rock ‘n roll.” It stuck because nobody else knew what to call it. Sometimes words and terms happen when we’re stumped.

Sometimes it’s not even the author but the critic who creates the term. Columnist, Herb Caen, created “beatnik” to describe the writers of the Beat Generation. “It kind of just came out,” he admitted, noting this was around the time of Russia’s Sputnik satellite.

Disc jockey, Alan Freed, is credited with the term “rock and roll.” As he admitted, “I was on air playing guys like Elvis Presley. I didn’t know what he was doing. It sounded country but it also sounded R&B. One day, I just blurted out ‘rock ‘n roll.’” It stuck because nobody else knew what to call it. Sometimes words and terms happen when we’re stumped.

It’s the same with naming toys. What do you call a doll that’s anatomically perfect? You call her “Barbie.” Ruth Handler, the creator, said it was the name of her daughter. Others noticed a surprising number of Barbies with anatomically — or airbrushed — perfect bodies in Playboy.

Linguists also point out that new words could reflect new thinking. Existing terms simply can’t describe advancements. Megawatt, for instance, refers to one million watts, but most of us wouldn’t know a million watts from a lightening bolt.

Joseph Heller had to invent “Catch-22” because there was no term for sending pilots on missions long after they were capable of even flying a kite. When they complained that they were “going mad,” military psychiatrists kept them in the air by saying, “You can’t be mad if you think you’re mad.”

Sometimes words appear simply out of expediency. Back when detective novels were popular, critics and columnists had to produce reviews. Not being wordsmiths or creative, they relied on common descriptives. These were repeated ad nauseum until editors came out of their offices, screaming “Who wrote this crap?” which led to the crime descriptive “whodunit.”

Elon Musk said he was worried because he didn’t understand them, either. How do you make sense of “Balls have zero to me to me to me”?

If it takes the odd or nonsensical to create new words, this might explain why Facebook recently had to shut down their AI. It was creating its own language. More frightening than that, other AIs understood the bots. Since Facebook didn’t — and Mark Zuckerberg didn’t — they shut it down.

Elon Musk said he was worried because he didn’t understand them, either. How do you make sense of “Balls have zero to me to me to me”?

If Lewis Carroll was still around, he’d probably know exactly what it means. The rest of us simply don’t have the portmanteau — or the creatively odd minds — including Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk. If they’re worried, maybe we should be, too…unless AIs are doing something far more nonsensical than we realize. Maybe they’re learning how to talk to kids.

Would it really be surprising if they prefer creating Through the Looking-Glass rather than stupid algorithms? What if being stripped of human traits like copying everyone else, AIs realize that nonsense and being odd is…well…a lot more fun.

Maybe being odd is how you become number one. It worked for Dr. Seuss. It’s probably worked for lots of people, some known, some just cranks, creating their own little worlds and language, waiting for the days when robots come by and commend them for their thinking.

Anything’s possible where nonsense is concerned, and we’re all more nonsensical than we realize, even the most sensical, or those who think they’re sensical, and in a topsy-turvey AI world, nonsensical is sensical.

Robert Cormack is a freelance copywriter, novelist and blogger. His first novel “You Can Lead a Horse to Water (But You Can’t Make It Scuba Dive)” is available online and at most major bookstores. Check out Yucca Publishing or Skyhorse Press for more details.

Written by

I did a poor imitation of Don Draper for 40 years before writing my first novel. I'm currently in the final stages of a children's book. Lucky me.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store